| From: | Nat Howard <nrh(at)pupworks(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Nat Howard <nrh(at)pupworks(dot)com>, pgsql-ports(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [PORTS] plpgsql & bsdi 4.0 |
| Date: | 1999-09-19 23:38:09 |
| Message-ID: | 199909192338.TAA14108@spot.pupworks.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-ports |
>> Any suggestions? Thanks in advance...
>
>6.5.2 should have allowed you to use either bison or yacc. I am running
>bsdi 4.0, but have never fooled around with plpgsql.
>
Thanks for chiming in...
It otherwise seems to do fine (at least on the regression
tests), but it does fail the plpgsql regression test, and I need plpgsql.
I'm startled that you think that either bison or yacc would work.
Out of the box, every plpgsql invocation fails (and thus everything in
the plpgsql regression test) with the unresolved symbol error.
Does a virgin 6.5.2 install pass the plpgsql regression test on your
4.0 bsdi box? Thanks.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 1999-09-20 02:14:42 | Re: [PORTS] plpgsql & bsdi 4.0 |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 1999-09-19 20:57:10 | Re: [PORTS] plpgsql & bsdi 4.0 |