| From: | Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Ryan Kirkpatrick <rkirkpat(at)nag(dot)cs(dot)colorado(dot)edu> |
| Cc: | Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>, pgsql-ports(at)postgreSQL(dot)org, Postgres Hackers List <hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [PORTS] RedHat6.0 & Alpha |
| Date: | 1999-07-30 16:04:01 |
| Message-ID: | 199907301604.MAA29190@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-ports |
> > And I'll go one better: v6.5.x is not "dead", in the sense that Tom
> > Lane has been faithfully applying relevant patches for his fixes in
> > case a v6.5.2 is released. I'll guess that the Intel problems noted
> > with the main tree are not present in the v6.5.x tree, so any new
> > problems noted would be due to the upcoming Alpha patches.
>
> So, if I understand this correctly, the snapshot available on the
> FTP site is from the unstable tree, and there is a "stable 6.5.x" tree
> that can only be access by cvs{up}? And that this stable tree should not
> have quite as much delta from 6.5.1 as the snapshots do? Or did I miss
> something?
Yes. This is correct.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | The Hermit Hacker | 1999-07-30 16:08:06 | Stable vs Current (Was: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PORTS] RedHat6.0 & Alpha) |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 1999-07-30 15:51:29 | Re: [PORTS] RedHat6.0 & Alpha |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | The Hermit Hacker | 1999-07-30 16:08:06 | Stable vs Current (Was: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PORTS] RedHat6.0 & Alpha) |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 1999-07-30 15:51:29 | Re: [PORTS] RedHat6.0 & Alpha |