| From: | Anja Speerforck <anja(at)damn(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Oliver Mueschke <o(at)mueschke(dot)de> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [GENERAL] JOIN exclusion problem |
| Date: | 1999-07-01 15:56:10 |
| Message-ID: | 199907011559.LAA21556@chet.brysonweb.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
At 12:42 01.07.99 +0200, you wrote:
>select ... from a, b where a.x=b.x
>union
>select ... from a, c where a.x=c.x
>
>is this what you wanted to achieve?
Actually, more like
select ... from a, b where a.x=b.x
union
select ... from a, c where a.y=c.y
As Chris Bitmead wrote:
>The problem is you've got two different result sets you need here.....
>You either need to break it into two separate queries or else make it
>into a UNION. If it's a UNION you will need to specify explicity what to
>put into k.name when joining with agenturen. I'm guessing that you want
>it blank in such a case.
Which is correct. I did try it as a UNION, and this didn't work since I do
need k.name to be blank. I believe the solution is in fact two separate
queries. We're trying that now....
Anja
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Mike Haberman | 1999-07-01 16:25:12 | help with SPI_<commands> Please |
| Previous Message | Mike Engelhart | 1999-07-01 15:33:52 | Re: [GENERAL] LinuxPPC |