| From: | Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | John Huttley <john(at)mwk(dot)co(dot)nz> |
| Cc: | Dustin Sallings <dustin(at)spy(dot)net>, pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [GENERAL] Limitation |
| Date: | 1999-06-25 12:56:40 |
| Message-ID: | 199906251256.IAA19598@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
> So lets have a look at everything again. Consider it a users wish list for
> 7.0
>
> 1. The 7 field index limit. Doubtless someone made a decision back in the
> dark ages that no-one would ever need
> more than that.
>
> 2. Ruleplan overflows. maybe fixing this is just changing a #define to
> allocate more space.
This is on 6.6 item list.
>
> 3. Parametised Stored Procedures that return record sets. This is a
> significant item. Commercial db's can do it.
> Porting modern applications to PG will require it.
>
> 4. Unlimited tuple size. I see that this is already on the list.
So is this one.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alex Shnitman | 1999-06-25 13:17:46 | *Old* PostgreSQL version |
| Previous Message | Alex Shnitman | 1999-06-25 12:20:15 | *Old* PostgreSQL version |