| From: | Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Jeff Hoffmann <jeff(at)remapcorp(dot)com>, hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] has anybody else used r-tree indexes in 6.5? |
| Date: | 1999-06-19 02:55:33 |
| Message-ID: | 199906190255.WAA12260@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> > In the meantime, I think the only possible patch is
> > to disable the error check in btreesel and have it return a default
> > selectivity estimate instead of complaining. Drat.
>
> ... and let's use this solution for the v6.5.x branch, once it comes
> into being.
He already did this, Thomas. The 6.5.x branch is currently our only
active branch. Any patches now applied appear in 6.5.x and 6.6. We
will split it when someone needs to start on 6.6-only features.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 1999-06-19 02:57:24 | Re: [HACKERS] has anybody else used r-tree indexes in 6.5? |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 1999-06-19 02:36:03 | Re: [HACKERS] has anybody else used r-tree indexes in 6.5? |