Re: [HACKERS] Savepoints...

From: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Vadim Mikheev <vadim(at)krs(dot)ru>
Cc: PostgreSQL Developers List <hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Savepoints...
Date: 1999-06-16 14:00:47
Message-ID: 199906161400.KAA23167@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> To have them I need to add tuple id (6 bytes) to heap tuple
> header. Are there objections? Though it's not good to increase
> tuple header size, subj is, imho, very nice feature...

Gee, that's a lot of overhead. We would go from 40 bytes ->46 bytes.

How is this different from the tid or oid? Reading your description, I
see there probably isn't another way to do it.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Lockhart 1999-06-16 14:03:38 Re: [HACKERS] 6.5.0 - Overflow bug in AVG( )
Previous Message José Soares 1999-06-16 13:54:44 having bug report