Re: [HACKERS] regress.sh

Thomas Lockhart wrote:
>> the only remaining query being:
>> *** expected/random.out Sun Aug 30 19:50:58 1998
>> --- results/random.out Mon Jun 14 15:18:04 1999
>> ***************
>> *** 19,23 ****
>> WHERE random NOT BETWEEN 80 AND 120;
>> random
>> ------
>> ! (0 rows)
>>
>> --- 19,24 ----
>> WHERE random NOT BETWEEN 80 AND 120;
>> random
>> ------
>> ! 124
>> ! (1 row)
>
>Well, sometimes random is too random. I'll bet if you run again you
>will see a different result; I'd hope that *usually* you will see the
>hoped-for result. I didn't want to make the criteria too loose so that
>we would miss real problems. But sometimes the test fails, even on my
>machine.

Every time I have run it I have had a 124 row. That's about 8 times.
(glibc2/linux/i386)

--
Vote against SPAM: http://www.politik-digital.de/spam/
========================================
Oliver Elphick Oliver(dot)Elphick(at)lfix(dot)co(dot)uk
Isle of Wight http://www.lfix.co.uk/oliver
PGP key from public servers; key ID 32B8FAA1
========================================
"I beseech you therefore, brethren, by the mercies of
God, that ye present your bodies a living sacrifice,
holy, acceptable unto God, which is your reasonable
service." Romans 12:1