Re: [GENERAL] overwriting large objects bug?

From: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Stphane Popinet <popinet(at)lmm(dot)jussieu(dot)fr>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] overwriting large objects bug?
Date: 1999-05-14 12:04:13
Message-ID: 199905141204.IAA28165@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

[Charset iso-8859-1 unsupported, filtering to ASCII...]
> Hi,
>
> I have some problems when trying to overwrite large objects (I use
> postgres 6.3.2-10). Apparently, everything looks allright when
> overwriting existing data but it fails when trying to write after the
> end of the existing large object.
>
> Before describing in more detail what happens, I'd like to ask to
> questions:
>
> - is that a known problem with large objects?
> _ is there a function which allows to import a file in an already
> existing large object (i.e. overwriting its contents)? (from what I saw
> in libpq-fe.h probably not).

Known problem. Fixed in 6.5 beta. 6.5 final is due June 1.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Aaron Holtz 1999-05-14 16:30:10 Does this function exist?
Previous Message Brett W. McCoy 1999-05-14 10:54:29 Re: [GENERAL] postgres getting slow