Re: [HACKERS] 6.5 TODO list

From: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] 6.5 TODO list
Date: 1999-05-11 18:23:26
Message-ID: 199905111823.OAA20654@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On Mon, 10 May 1999, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> > > > Vacuum of tables >2 gigs - NOTICE: Can't truncate multi-segments relation
> > >
> > > This is definitely a "must fix" item for 6.5, IMHO...
> >
> > Yes. It shows we are getting bigger. Most/all? of my commerical
> > database clients don't have 2-gig tables.
>
> I'm not sure what is involved in fixing this, but...>2gig tables, in the
> past, were iffy to start with. if we can fix before v6.5, fine...if not,
> my opinion is that isn't a release stopper. Or, rather...is it something
> that, other then in testing, has affected anyone?
>
> > > > GROUP BY can reference columns not in target list
> > >
> > > What's wrong with that?
> >
> > Is that not a problem. What possible use would GROUP BY on columns not
> > in target list be of use. Maybe it is. I remember someone asking for
> > something like this. I will remove the item unless someone complains.
> > I thought you were the one complaining about it.
>
> Even if we don't remove it, sounds like a feature vs bug fix...

We are not saying these are show-stoppers, but things that should be
resolved before final, no?

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 1999-05-11 18:30:20 Re: [HACKERS] More on GROUP BY
Previous Message Tom Lane 1999-05-11 18:20:21 Re: [HACKERS] 6.5 TODO list