| From: | Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, postgres <hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Re: SIGBUS in AllocSetAlloc & jdbc |
| Date: | 1999-05-09 14:56:26 |
| Message-ID: | 199905091456.XAA00493@ext16.sra.co.jp |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> This is all clearly part of the large object mess that we were in before
> you fixed large objects.
>
> Do whatever you think is best for the long term. Large objects were so
> terribly fragile in previous releases, we might as well advertise them
> again as now working 100% of the time. If the new behaviour changes
> existing apps, that is OK if the new behaviour is superior. They will
> be thrilled to change their apps if the large object system now works
> better.
>
> It would be different if the old system worked properly.
I have changed lo_read/lo_write so that they run under same memory
context as other LO calls.
---
Tatsuo Ishii
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 1999-05-09 14:57:16 | Re: [HACKERS] Problem with complex query |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 1999-05-09 14:56:07 | Re: [HACKERS] inet data type regression test fails |