Re: [HACKERS] an older problem? hash table out of memory

From: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Michael Contzen <mcontzen(at)dohle(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] an older problem? hash table out of memory
Date: 1999-05-04 04:38:49
Message-ID: 199905040438.AAA15458@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> Michael Contzen <mcontzen(at)dohle(dot)com> writes:
> > Well, increasing the buffers to -B256 results to:
> > pqReadData() -- backend closed the channel unexpectedly.
> > The log says:
> > FATAL: s_lock(4015e1c5) at bufmgr.c:1949, stuck spinlock. Aborting.
>
> I can't reproduce that here... anyone else?
>
> The "hashtable out of memory" problem is reproducible, however.
> I'm on it.

Historically, no one knows much about the hash routines.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 1999-05-04 04:41:30 Re: [HACKERS] XIDTAG ???
Previous Message Todd Graham Lewis 1999-05-04 02:32:49 Re: [HACKERS] XIDTAG ???