| From: | Peter Galbavy <Peter(dot)Galbavy(at)knowledge(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Galbavy <Peter(dot)Galbavy(at)knowledge(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] signal weirdness |
| Date: | 1999-03-29 11:17:12 |
| Message-ID: | 19990329121712.A11678@office.knowledge.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Mar 29, 1999 at 11:03:49AM +0100, Peter Galbavy wrote:
> Oh, the result - the regression tests hang waiting for the postgres
> process to receive the SIGQUIT to abort transaction that never
> comes.
My quick fix has been to replace the kill() with a direct call
to siglongjmp() - not sure if this is safe, but it works. I
am being a pragmatist today.
I will try to get more debugging done on the signal problem at
some stage, but I seem to have a "working" solution.
Is their any reason not to replace the kill() with a longjmp()
in the long run - no pun intended.
Regards,
--
Peter Galbavy
Knowledge Matters Ltd
http://www.knowledge.com /http://www.wonderland.org/ http://www.literature.org/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dmitry Samersoff | 1999-03-29 11:34:40 | New mirror |
| Previous Message | Chris Bitmead | 1999-03-29 10:58:12 | Large objects error - expected a 'V' from the backend |