Re: [HACKERS] portals vs. memory contexts

From: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us (Bruce Momjian)
Cc: vadim(at)krs(dot)ru, hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] portals vs. memory contexts
Date: 1999-03-23 03:09:45
Message-ID: 199903230309.WAA02572@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

>
> I notice you used portals for vacuum, rather than a separate memory
> context. Can I ask why?
>
> I am considering creating an expression portal or memory context to
> prevent the memory leaks from the utils/adt functions.
>

I am also confused about varaible portal memory vs heap portal memory.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Vadim Mikheev 1999-03-23 03:17:09 Re: portals vs. memory contexts
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 1999-03-23 02:51:42 portals vs. memory contexts