Re: [SQL] Vacuum

From: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: sas(at)schell(dot)de (Sascha Schumann)
Cc: tims(at)dcs(dot)state(dot)ar(dot)us, pgsql-sql(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [SQL] Vacuum
Date: 1999-03-18 20:14:16
Message-ID: 199903182014.PAA07361@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-sql

-- Start of included mail.

> On Thu, Mar 18, 1999 at 08:41:21AM -0600, Tim Stoddard wrote:
> > When I delete 2k-3k of records from a table the vacuum process seems
> > to take forever. I have let the vacuum run for 24 hours before with
> > not luck.
> >
> > Can someone one explain to me what is going on?
>
> Funny, there is/was just a whole thread about that on hackers. There seem to
> be some agreement that this will be reworked/faster in 6.6, but you cannot
> avoid it currently. The main cause for this is the usage of indeces.
>
> Did you pass -o -F to the postmaster? It can improve the speed of PostgreSQL
> dramatically.

This vacuum speedup may be in 6.5, thanks to Vadim.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jonathan A. Zdziarski 1999-03-18 20:57:22 Macintosh Drivers
Previous Message Sascha Schumann 1999-03-18 19:58:31 Re: [SQL] Vacuum

Browse pgsql-sql by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tim Perdue 1999-03-18 23:44:26 Stuck on SQL - Any Takers?
Previous Message Sascha Schumann 1999-03-18 19:58:31 Re: [SQL] Vacuum