From: | Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | glgay(at)pass(dot)korea(dot)army(dot)mil (Gerald L(dot) Gay) |
Cc: | hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] for row in select loop question |
Date: | 1999-03-14 16:46:44 |
Message-ID: | 199903141646.LAA26832@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Older patch reversed out, and new patch applied.
Thanks.
[Charset iso-8859-1 unsupported, filtering to ASCII...]
> This is another example of why not allowing utility functions in SPI would
> be a Bad Thing.
>
> For what it's worth, I found another case in libpq where you can get a T
> message without a D that my utility patch needs to handle. I have attached
> the updated patch against the 6.4.2 version of
> src/interfaces/libpq/fe-exec.c
>
> Jerry
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: jwieck(at)debis(dot)com [SMTP:jwieck(at)debis(dot)com]
> > Sent: Friday, March 05, 1999 3:00 AM
> > To: Michael Davis
> > Cc: hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
> > Subject: Re: [HACKERS] for row in select loop question
> >
> > >
> >
> > Second REVOKE and GRANT are utility statements not supported
> > for prepared SPI plans and thus PL/pgSQL currently cannot
> > execute them.
> >
> >
> > Jan
> >
> > --
> >
> >
> >#======================================================================#
> > # It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being
> >right. #
> > # Let's break this rule - forgive me.
> >#
> > #======================================== jwieck(at)debis(dot)com (Jan
> >Wieck) #
> >
[Attachment, skipping...]
--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 1999-03-14 16:49:19 | Re: your mail |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 1999-03-14 16:42:13 | Re: [HACKERS] libpq and SPI |