Re: [HACKERS] Re: Max backend limits cleaned up

From: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: daryl(at)www(dot)com (Daryl W(dot) Dunbar)
Cc: tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: Max backend limits cleaned up
Date: 1999-02-22 16:57:21
Message-ID: 199902221657.LAA29818@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

[Charset iso-8859-1 unsupported, filtering to ASCII...]
> Having recently experienced a similar problem with semaphores and
> kernel size, I can say it is an issue. I feel that documentation
> will clear it up either way. Either you lower the default backend
> limit, and document how to raise it along with the associated kernel
> variables, or leave it alone and document the appropriate steps to
> tuning the kernel to accommodate it and how to lower it if you don't
> want to tune the kernel.
>

The issue for me is that novices who are never going to hit the 32-user
limit should be able to install PostgreSQL with no major changes,
including not even a postmaster flag to lower the limit.

If you need more than 32 connections, you will be able to modify the
kernel.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Daryl W. Dunbar 1999-02-22 17:13:10 RE: [HACKERS] Re: Max backend limits cleaned up
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 1999-02-22 16:55:00 Re: [HACKERS] Re: Max backend limits cleaned up