Re: [HACKERS] Re: Max backend limits cleaned up

From: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us (Tom Lane)
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: Max backend limits cleaned up
Date: 1999-02-21 19:27:36
Message-ID: 199902211927.OAA19476@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> >> 5. Allocation of semaphores and shared memory is now based on
> >> -N switch value (default or specified) rather than the MAXBACKENDS
> >> constant.
>
> > sgml and man documenation updates, right? Or should I do it?
>
> I put something into the docs last night in the places where configure
> and postmaster switches are described.
>
> I am thinking, though, that we also ought to have FAQ entries under
> headings like:
>
> I get "IpcSemaphoreCreate: semget failed (No space left on device)"
> when I try to start the postmaster
>
> I get 'Sorry, too many clients already' when trying to connect
>
> If you like, I'll try to write up a first cut at these.

Sure.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 1999-02-21 19:28:52 Re: [HACKERS] Anyone understand shared-memory space usage?
Previous Message Tom Lane 1999-02-21 18:58:04 Anyone understand shared-memory space usage?