Re: [SQL] Performance Question

From: Viorel Anghel <vang(at)altavista(dot)net>
To: pgsql-sql(at)hub(dot)org
Cc: tim(at)dmcity(dot)net
Subject: Re: [SQL] Performance Question
Date: 1999-02-04 21:57:18
Message-ID: 19990204165718.E16437@zeus.advatech.ro
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-sql

On Wed, Feb 03, 1999 at 08:25:25PM -0600, Tim Perdue wrote:
> Please email directly to tim(at)dmcity(dot)net(dot)
hmm, and CC to list, we also want to know ;-)

[snip]

> am I going to get killed with a performance hit?? It's running OK now, with
> the table at 20MB, but I have 100MB more worth of letters to drop into the
> table..... 8-)

1. What does mean "OK now"? Just for my curiosity, on which machine and
which is the average time for such a query?

2. Why don't you test with the rest of 100MB and tell us what is happening?

--
___
<o-o> Viorel ANGHEL <vang(at)altavista(dot)net>
[`-']
-"-"-

In response to

Browse pgsql-sql by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dimitri 1999-02-04 22:10:05 Re: [SQL] problem with join & count
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 1999-02-04 21:51:58 Re: [SQL] keeping OID's when copying table