Re: [HACKERS] doc/FAQ* files are hosed

From: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us (Tom Lane)
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] doc/FAQ* files are hosed
Date: 1999-01-17 01:43:59
Message-ID: 199901170143.UAA00861@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> Comparing the current-CVS FAQ files with those in the REL6_4 branch
> is depressing --- almost every one is messed up in one branch or the
> other.
>
> The main FAQ is newer in the 6.4 branch than in the current branch; the
> 6.4 version seems to have numerous small fixes that are not in the main
> branch. FAQ_CVS is also newer in 6.4; it's been de-HTMLized in 6.4
> (good) but not in current. FAQ_HPUX, FAQ_Irix, and FAQ_Linux are
> completely trashed in the 6.4 branch --- all three have been overwritten
> with some generic document.

I must have done that during the 6.4.2 release process. I decided to
grab them from the web site, but it looks like I got the wrong pages
somehow.

They get over-written with ever release, so I have another chance to try
it for 6.5.

This does not apply to the FAQ_CVS. That's someone else.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 1999-01-17 03:35:52 Re: [HACKERS] Backend crash in opr_sanity regression test.
Previous Message Tom Lane 1999-01-17 00:14:59 Re: [HACKERS] 6.4.2 HP-UX makefile problem?