Re: [DOCS] Upcoming Attractions, web site

From: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu (Thomas G(dot) Lockhart)
Cc: hal(at)enteract(dot)com, docs(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [DOCS] Upcoming Attractions, web site
Date: 1999-01-07 17:47:34
Message-ID: 199901071747.MAA07054@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers

> Looks nice. Might rephrase:
>
> Those of you who did not like
> our table-level locking will be pleasantly surprised.
>
> to be something like
>
> Those of you wanting alternatives to
> our table-level locking will be pleasantly surprised.
>
> The new CASE statement might be of interest, and I'm looking forward to
> getting far enough along on outer joins to get a mention of that too :)

Yes, CASE would be good to add. You can say:

An SQL-standard CASE statement is planned too.

Thomas, do you need help on outer joins?

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 1999-01-07 17:54:11 Re: [DOCS] Upcoming Attractions, web site
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 1999-01-07 17:31:06 Re: [DOCS] Upcoming Attractions, web site

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 1999-01-07 17:49:57 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PORTS] vacuum takes too long
Previous Message Jackson, DeJuan 1999-01-07 17:31:56 RE: [HACKERS] Re: [PORTS] vacuum takes too long