Re: [HACKERS] 6.4.1 contrib/spi/

From: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: terry(at)terrym(dot)com (Terry Mackintosh)
Cc: hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] 6.4.1 contrib/spi/
Date: 1998-12-12 22:51:37
Message-ID: 199812122251.RAA06605@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> Hi all
>
> Just a follow up, did that datetime stuff I submitted ever become part of
> the soon to be 6.4.1 tree?
>
> I just never seen any reply one way or the other, and wanted to make sure
> it did not just fall into a balck hole :-)
>
> It seemed to me that it may also be usefull to others. For those who
> don't know or forgot, it is a function to be called from a triger befor
> update, and will set the specified datetime field to the current datetime,
> thus implimenting a modification time stamp.
>
> I have re-attached the tgz file just incase it got lost.
> It should be unpacked in ..../pgsql/contrib/spi/ and the Makefile patched
> with the supplied patch.

Done. But in 6.5 tree, not 6.4.1. You mentioned it has not been
completely tested, so only in 6.5.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Terry Mackintosh 1998-12-13 00:04:16 Re: [HACKERS] 6.4.1 contrib/spi/
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 1998-12-12 22:40:34 Re: [HACKERS] shmem limits and redolog