From: | Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | terry(at)terrym(dot)com (Terry Mackintosh) |
Cc: | hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] 6.4.1 contrib/spi/ |
Date: | 1998-12-12 22:51:37 |
Message-ID: | 199812122251.RAA06605@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> Hi all
>
> Just a follow up, did that datetime stuff I submitted ever become part of
> the soon to be 6.4.1 tree?
>
> I just never seen any reply one way or the other, and wanted to make sure
> it did not just fall into a balck hole :-)
>
> It seemed to me that it may also be usefull to others. For those who
> don't know or forgot, it is a function to be called from a triger befor
> update, and will set the specified datetime field to the current datetime,
> thus implimenting a modification time stamp.
>
> I have re-attached the tgz file just incase it got lost.
> It should be unpacked in ..../pgsql/contrib/spi/ and the Makefile patched
> with the supplied patch.
Done. But in 6.5 tree, not 6.4.1. You mentioned it has not been
completely tested, so only in 6.5.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Terry Mackintosh | 1998-12-13 00:04:16 | Re: [HACKERS] 6.4.1 contrib/spi/ |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 1998-12-12 22:40:34 | Re: [HACKERS] shmem limits and redolog |