Re: [HACKERS] Sigh, build is broken again

From: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us (Tom Lane)
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Sigh, build is broken again
Date: 1998-12-11 16:50:24
Message-ID: 199812111650.LAA12827@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Is this item resolved?

> Someone checked in code that assumes vsnprintf() exists.
>
> Should be cool, we have an emulation right? Well, no.
> configure sets up to build port/snprintf.c if snprintf()
> doesn't exist. HPUX, for one, has that but not vsnprintf.
>
> I guess the right fix is for configure to check for *both*
> snprintf and vsnprintf --- anyone see a problem with that?
>
> regards, tom lane
>
>

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 1998-12-11 16:51:44 Re: [HACKERS] lock table
Previous Message Constantin Teodorescu 1998-12-11 16:48:17 For the TODO list