Re: [HACKERS] Another bug in pg_operator.h

From: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org (The Hermit Hacker)
Cc: tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Another bug in pg_operator.h
Date: 1998-10-29 04:20:09
Message-ID: 199810290420.XAA05544@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On Wed, 28 Oct 1998, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> > Actually, the darn thing is *crawling* with bugs.
>
> Guess BETA3 won't be the release, eh? *grin*

I can see an argument for letting it go for 6.5, but if it is broken,
and is showing up in regression testing, I think we have to fix it.

We can't fix it in 6.4.*. No initdb for that.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message The Hermit Hacker 1998-10-29 04:32:49 Re: [HACKERS] Open 6.4 items
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 1998-10-29 04:09:28 Re: [HACKERS] Another bug in pg_operator.h