Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] psql's help (the LIMIT stuff)

From: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: jwieck(at)debis(dot)com
Cc: hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org (PostgreSQL-development)
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] psql's help (the LIMIT stuff)
Date: 1998-10-26 03:06:52
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
> > Seems like it would be a nice minor release item, but the problem is
> > that minor releases aren't tested as much as major ones.  How confident
> > are you in the code?  What do others thing?
>     I regression tested it,  and  did  additional  tests  in  the
>     SPI/PL  area.  It  works.  It only touches the parser and the
>     executor. Rules, planner/optimizer just bypass the values  in
>     the  parsetree.  The  parser  and  the  executor are parts of
>     Postgres I feel very familiar with (not so in the optimizer).
>     I  trust  in  the  code  and  would  use  it  in a production
>     environment.
>     It's below.

Haven't forgotten about this.  Planned for the first minor release after
6.4.  Hopefully I will have a cnf'ify/OR/palloc fix by then too.

  Bruce Momjian                        |
  maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us            |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Thomas G. LockhartDate: 1998-10-26 05:34:09
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] datetime regression test fails at daylight savings transitions
Previous:From: Thomas A. SzybistDate: 1998-10-26 02:46:53
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Last call?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group