Re: [HACKERS] Last call?

From: "Thomas A(dot) Szybist" <szybist(at)boxhill(dot)com>
To: "Thomas G(dot) Lockhart" <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>
Cc: Postgres Hackers List <hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>, Postgres Documentation List <docs(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>, geek+(at)cmu(dot)edu, brook(at)trillium(dot)NMSU(dot)Edu, tih(at)hamartun(dot)priv(dot)no, rkirkpat(at)nag(dot)cs(dot)colorado(dot)edu, martin(at)biochemistry(dot)ucl(dot)ac(dot)uk, t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp, Keith Parks <emkxp01(at)mtcc(dot)demon(dot)co(dot)uk>, dlw(at)seavme(dot)xroads(dot)com
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Last call?
Date: 1998-10-26 02:46:53
Message-ID: 199810260246.VAA29921@carmina.boxhill
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

In message <3633AC8B(dot)756C31BB(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>, "Thomas G. Lockhart" writes:
> > I just gave today's (Oct 25) snapshot a try on Sparc Linux.
> > Looks good except datetime.
>
> OK, picky picky. Run the test tomorrow instead. And I'll mark you down
> as having tested and passed today :)
>
> - Tom

Do I still get full credit ?:)

I noticed your list did not have Solaris / Sparc. I gave that a spin
as well. Aside from datetime, my results confirm the expected diffs
supplied.

Tom Szybist
szybist(at)boxhill(dot)com

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 1998-10-26 03:06:52 Re: [HACKERS] psql's help (the LIMIT stuff)
Previous Message Tom Lane 1998-10-26 01:30:15 Re: [HACKERS] Last call?