Re: [HACKERS] Features list

From: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: marc(at)fallon(dot)classyad(dot)com (Marc Howard Zuckman)
Cc: hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Features list
Date: 1998-10-25 02:41:55
Message-ID: 199810250241.WAA01341@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On Sat, 24 Oct 1998, Bruce Momjian wrote, in part:
>
> > CHANGES IN THE 6.4 RELEASE
> > --------------------------
> >
> > Bug Fixes
> > ---------
> >
> > Enhancements
> > ------------
> > Enable HAVING clause but no fixes elsewhere yet.
> > Add HAVING clause with full support for subselects and unions(Stephan)
>
> These two comments raise a question as to whether the having clause
> is fully functional. Is it thought to be fully implemented and bug
> free?

Full functional.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 1998-10-25 02:47:47 Re: [HACKERS] pg_upgrade bug report
Previous Message Billy G. Allie 1998-10-25 00:32:33 Re: [HACKERS] Configure problem (and fix).