From: | Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | marc(at)fallon(dot)classyad(dot)com (Marc Howard Zuckman) |
Cc: | hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Features list |
Date: | 1998-10-25 02:41:55 |
Message-ID: | 199810250241.WAA01341@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> On Sat, 24 Oct 1998, Bruce Momjian wrote, in part:
>
> > CHANGES IN THE 6.4 RELEASE
> > --------------------------
> >
> > Bug Fixes
> > ---------
> >
> > Enhancements
> > ------------
> > Enable HAVING clause but no fixes elsewhere yet.
> > Add HAVING clause with full support for subselects and unions(Stephan)
>
> These two comments raise a question as to whether the having clause
> is fully functional. Is it thought to be fully implemented and bug
> free?
Full functional.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 1998-10-25 02:47:47 | Re: [HACKERS] pg_upgrade bug report |
Previous Message | Billy G. Allie | 1998-10-25 00:32:33 | Re: [HACKERS] Configure problem (and fix). |