Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] Dumping of views -- done!

From: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: terry(at)terrym(dot)com (Terry Mackintosh)
Cc: hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Dumping of views -- done!
Date: 1998-10-04 01:06:44
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
> Hi all
> Is it too late to add a feature to pg_dump for 6.4??
> I just spent most of the day learning pg_dump and modifing it so it would
> dump views also.
> This is the first time I have ever contributed any code changes, so I'm
> not sure of how to submit it.
> The diff's and a readme as a tgz file are attached.
> Thanks
> Terry Mackintosh <terry(at)terrym(dot)com>
> sysadmin/owner  Please! No MIME encoded or HTML mail, unless needed.

I though we dumped views already.  If not, I am inclinded to apply it,
but want to see what others say.  I thought Jan was working on this, or
was that just rewrite rules?  Are you using his code?  I know there is
an item on the Open Items list that talks about this:

	have psql dump out rules text with new function

Is that what this is?

  Bruce Momjian                        |
  maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us            |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 1998-10-04 01:57:30
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] RE: [GENERAL] Long update query ? (also Re: [GENERAL] CNF vs. DNF)
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 1998-10-04 01:02:21
Subject: IP test program

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2018 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group