Re: [HACKERS] Open 6.4 items

From: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: jwieck(at)debis(dot)com
Cc: jwieck(at)debis(dot)com, hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Open 6.4 items
Date: 1998-10-02 16:26:04
Message-ID: 199810021626.MAA10401@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> Here's a combination of all the patches I'm currently waiting
> for against a just updated CVS tree. It contains
>
> Partial new rewrite system that handles subselects, view
> aggregate columns, insert into select from view, updates
> with set col = view-value and select rules restriction to
> view definition.
>
> Updates for rule/view backparsing utility functions to
> handle subselects correct.
>
> Little changes to system views pg_rules and pg_views.
>
> New system views pg_tables and pg_indexes (where you can
> see the complete index definition in the latter one).
>
> Enabling array references on query parameters.
>
> Bugfix for functional index.
>
> The rule system isn't a release-stopper any longer.
>
> But another stopper is that I don't know if the latest
> changes to PL/pgSQL (not already in CVS) made it compile on
> AIX. Still wait for some response from Dave.
>

Applied.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Taral 1998-10-02 16:37:15 RE: [GENERAL] Long update query ? (also Re: [GENERAL] CNF vs. DNF)
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 1998-10-02 16:23:23 Re: [HACKERS] patching utilities?