Re: [HACKERS] union regression test

From: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu (Thomas G(dot) Lockhart)
Cc: brook(at)trillium(dot)NMSU(dot)Edu, tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us, hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] union regression test
Date: 1998-09-17 03:59:54
Message-ID: 199809170359.XAA20184@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> I had included float8 in this particular regression test to exercise the
> int4->float8 "promotion" since float8 is a "preferred type". Don't know
> why float4 should in general have different or better behavior than
> float8 wrt conversions and rounding; you may just be lucky on your
> platform.

In fact, float4 normally has much _worse_ floating point portability
than float8.

float4 can't seem to get even simple number right.

--
Bruce Momjian | 830 Blythe Avenue
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
http://www.op.net/~candle | (610) 353-9879(w)
+ If your life is a hard drive, | (610) 853-3000(h)
+ Christ can be your backup. |

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Meskes 1998-09-17 08:18:52 Re: [HACKERS] Transaction system (proposal for 6.5)
Previous Message Thomas G. Lockhart 1998-09-17 01:54:06 Re: [HACKERS] union regression test