Re: AW: [HACKERS] sequence creation

From: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: andreas(dot)zeugswetter(at)telecom(dot)at (Andreas Zeugswetter)
Cc: lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu, hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: AW: [HACKERS] sequence creation
Date: 1998-08-29 02:55:29
Message-ID: 199808290255.WAA27658@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

>
> >> Right now, we allow PRIMARY to auto-create an index.
> >> Can we have something to auto-create sequences, instead of the more
> >> complicated CREATE SEQUENCE process.
> >> Perhaps use the data type SERIAL to autocreate a sequence. Should
> >> make life easier for novices. We are getting too many sequence
> >> questions.
> >
> >That would be possible. I'd be happier doing it for v6.5, since I'm
> >hoping to work on docs in the meantime. Of course, maybe it would be
> >easy :)
> >
> >What should the syntax be exactly?
> >
> > CREATE TABLE t (s SERIAL);
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> exactly this. :-) (like in Informix)
>
> Informix also allows to specify a starting value like:
> create table t (s serial(1000));
> defaulting to 1 but I think this additional syntax is rather misleading

Thanks to Thomas, this will be in 6.4.

--
Bruce Momjian | 830 Blythe Avenue
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
+ If your life is a hard drive, | (610) 353-9879(w)
+ Christ can be your backup. | (610) 853-3000(h)

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 1998-08-29 02:55:53 Re: [HACKERS] Minor bug: inconsistent handling of overlength names
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 1998-08-29 02:54:49 Re: [HACKERS] odd pg_dump output?