Re: [HACKERS] initdb problems

From: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us (Tom Lane)
Cc: hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] initdb problems
Date: 1998-08-25 02:35:09
Message-ID: 199808250235.WAA01804@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> >> Firstly, configure.in seems to have reverted to it's original state
> >> where the HAVE_LONG* stuff was broken.
>
> > OK, I am not dealing with configure.in again on this int64 stuff. If
> > someone wants to submit a patch to fix it, go ahead. No, "Just make it
> > look like ...".
>
> It's weird, I see the entries in "cvs log configure.in" saying that you
> fixed it in updates 1.184 and 1.185, but there's no difference between
> 1.183 and 1.185:
>
> $ cvs diff -r1.183 -r1.185 configure.in
> Index: configure.in
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /usr/local/cvsroot/pgsql/src/configure.in,v
> retrieving revision 1.183
> retrieving revision 1.185
> diff -r1.183 -r1.185
> $
>
> I hope this was just pilot error on your part, and not a symptom of
> a cvs bug :-(
>
> Anyway, here's a patch from the way that configure.in looks as of right
> now, 1.185.
>
> (It looks like the reason I messed up the int64 tests is that I copied
> and pasted the HAVE_DBL_MIN_PROBLEM test, which was also broken...
> fixed here.)
>

I think I applied a patch, then reversed it manually trying to fix the
other section. Patch applied and config run.

--
Bruce Momjian | 830 Blythe Avenue
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
+ If your life is a hard drive, | (610) 353-9879(w)
+ Christ can be your backup. | (610) 853-3000(h)

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas G. Lockhart 1998-08-25 02:57:17 Re: [GENERAL] More details on Database corruption
Previous Message Tom Lane 1998-08-25 01:19:12 Re: [HACKERS] initdb problems