From: | Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | jwieck(at)debis(dot)com |
Cc: | jwieck(at)debis(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Rules and views (was Re: [HACKERS] Rules: 2nd patch) |
Date: | 1998-08-19 17:56:00 |
Message-ID: | 199808191756.NAA04184@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> If nobody votes against, I would like to make them builtins
> as pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() and then setup the
> appropriate views (pg_rule and pg_view) in template1 by
> initdb like we do it with pg_user. It cannot break anything,
> except that a rule action the two functions cannot handle
> will make the new views unusable. But it would be a really
> powerful possibility for pg_dump or just useful to see what
> that damn event qual and parsetree's in pg_rewrite came from.
>
> Comments?
>
Go, Jan, go.
--
Bruce Momjian | 830 Blythe Avenue
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
+ If your life is a hard drive, | (610) 353-9879(w)
+ Christ can be your backup. | (610) 853-3000(h)
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dr. Michael Meskes | 1998-08-19 18:09:35 | Re: [HACKERS] initb won't work |
Previous Message | Jan Wieck | 1998-08-19 17:13:27 | Rules and views (was Re: [HACKERS] Rules: 2nd patch) |