Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [GENERAL] more nodeError problems and general view failures!

From: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: delmendo(at)cymitar(dot)net
Cc: hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org (PostgreSQL-development)
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] more nodeError problems and general view failures!
Date: 1998-07-14 00:11:28
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
> On 13-Jul-98 Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > 
> > Oops, forget the previous patch.  Here is the real fix:
> > 
> > -- 
> Thanks very much for all your help. This seems to have solved the problem. I'll let you kn
> ow if I run into anything else weird- One question - A number of views I have seem to viol
> ate the new max query plan (Why did it shrink so dramatically)  - I know that this will be
>  fixed in 6.4 - but I need a solution for the short term:
> Earlier I took postgres and replaced all the 8192 with 16384 (8k->16K)  this compiled and 
> seemed to work fine - My basic question is - how ill advised is this? Is there a better wa
> y?  

Not all fields were dumped in pre 6.3.  Now, more data is dumped per

Not sure.  Cc'ed to hackers.

Bruce Momjian                          |  830 Blythe Avenue
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us              |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  (610) 353-9879(w)
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  (610) 853-3000(h)

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: The Hermit HackerDate: 1998-07-14 00:45:04
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] HPUX Port
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 1998-07-13 22:02:51
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Sequence objects have no global currval operator?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group