Re: [GENERAL] more nodeError problems and general view failures!

From: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: delmendo(at)cymitar(dot)net
Cc: hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org (PostgreSQL-development)
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] more nodeError problems and general view failures!
Date: 1998-07-14 00:11:28
Message-ID: 199807140011.UAA04708@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

>
> On 13-Jul-98 Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >
> > Oops, forget the previous patch. Here is the real fix:
> >
> > --
> Thanks very much for all your help. This seems to have solved the problem. I'll let you kn
> ow if I run into anything else weird- One question - A number of views I have seem to viol
> ate the new max query plan (Why did it shrink so dramatically) - I know that this will be
> fixed in 6.4 - but I need a solution for the short term:
>
> Earlier I took postgres and replaced all the 8192 with 16384 (8k->16K) this compiled and
> seemed to work fine - My basic question is - how ill advised is this? Is there a better wa
> y?

Not all fields were dumped in pre 6.3. Now, more data is dumped per
view.

Not sure. Cc'ed to hackers.

--
Bruce Momjian | 830 Blythe Avenue
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
+ If your life is a hard drive, | (610) 353-9879(w)
+ Christ can be your backup. | (610) 853-3000(h)

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message The Hermit Hacker 1998-07-14 00:45:04 Re: [HACKERS] HPUX Port
Previous Message Tom Lane 1998-07-13 22:02:51 Re: [HACKERS] Sequence objects have no global currval operator?