> I hoped to get pl/pgsql finished before 6.4, but since I got
> some private trouble and much serious work, I fear to miss
> that target too. Haven't had my fingers on PostgreSQL at all
> for the last weeks.
> But you're right, the rewrite handler still needs work and
> since I spent much time to understand the code it would be
> wasted time if someone else has to do it.
> Let's see if I find some time sometimes :-)
That would be good. The pl/pgsql would be nice, but the rewrite system
is more significant to users right now.
Bruce Momjian | 830 Blythe Avenue
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
+ If your life is a hard drive, | (610) 353-9879(w)
+ Christ can be your backup. | (610) 853-3000(h)
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 1998-07-09 15:16:01|
|Subject: Re: [HACKERS] New s_lock.h fails on HPUX with gcc |
|Previous:||From: Maarten Boekhold||Date: 1998-07-09 14:31:24|
|Subject: Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Backend as SW Gateway to Oracle|