Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PG95-DEV] Rule system

From: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: jwieck(at)debis(dot)com
Cc: wieck(at)sapserv(dot)debis(dot)de, hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PG95-DEV] Rule system
Date: 1998-07-09 15:05:56
Message-ID: 199807091505.LAA20916@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> I hoped to get pl/pgsql finished before 6.4, but since I got
> some private trouble and much serious work, I fear to miss
> that target too. Haven't had my fingers on PostgreSQL at all
> for the last weeks.
>
> But you're right, the rewrite handler still needs work and
> since I spent much time to understand the code it would be
> wasted time if someone else has to do it.
>
> Let's see if I find some time sometimes :-)

That would be good. The pl/pgsql would be nice, but the rewrite system
is more significant to users right now.

--
Bruce Momjian | 830 Blythe Avenue
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
+ If your life is a hard drive, | (610) 353-9879(w)
+ Christ can be your backup. | (610) 853-3000(h)

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 1998-07-09 15:16:01 Re: [HACKERS] New s_lock.h fails on HPUX with gcc
Previous Message Maarten Boekhold 1998-07-09 14:31:24 Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Backend as SW Gateway to Oracle