Re: [HACKERS] now 6.4

From: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: vadim(at)krs(dot)ru (Vadim Mikheev)
Cc: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org, dg(at)illustra(dot)com, miker(at)hub(dot)org, hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] now 6.4
Date: 1998-06-30 04:36:25
Message-ID: 199806300436.AAA07550@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

>
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >
> > > As for dropping/recreating all indices...that isn't really so bad,
> > > anyway...once all the data is there, th edatabase can go live...albeit
> > > *very* slow, in some cases, if I have 4 indices on a table, each one built
> > > should improve the speed of queries, but each build shouldn't limit the
> > > ability for the database to be up...
> >
> > Doesn't index creation lock the table?
>
> Lock for read...

Yep, good point. Reads are OK.

--
Bruce Momjian | 830 Blythe Avenue
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
+ If your life is a hard drive, | (610) 353-9879(w)
+ Christ can be your backup. | (610) 853-3000(h)

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 1998-06-30 04:40:30 flowchart updated
Previous Message Vadim Mikheev 1998-06-30 04:20:02 Re: [HACKERS] now 6.4