From: | Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | scrappy(at)hub(dot)org (The Hermit Hacker) |
Cc: | vadim(at)krs(dot)ru, dg(at)illustra(dot)com, miker(at)hub(dot)org, hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] now 6.4 |
Date: | 1998-06-29 23:42:12 |
Message-ID: | 199806292342.TAA01426@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> Now, I liked the idea that was presented about moving the
> database directories out of the way and then moving them back in after an
> initdb...is this not doable? What caveats are there to doing this?
> Individual database's will be missing fields added in the release upgrade,
> so if you want some of the v6.4 new features, you'd have to dump the
> individual database and then reload it, but if you don't care, you'd have
> some optimizations associated with the new release?
We will move the old data files out of the way, run initdb, reload a
pg_dump with schema-only, then move the data files back into the proper
locations, and perhaps drop/recreate all indexes. They will have all
the features. They have just kept their raw data files.
How long does re-indexing the tables take vs. reloading and re-indexing?
--
Bruce Momjian | 830 Blythe Avenue
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
+ If your life is a hard drive, | (610) 353-9879(w)
+ Christ can be your backup. | (610) 853-3000(h)
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Vince Vielhaber | 1998-06-30 00:06:33 | Re: [HACKERS] now 6.4 |
Previous Message | The Hermit Hacker | 1998-06-29 23:39:21 | Re: [HACKERS] now 6.4 |