Re: AW: [HACKERS] using a btree index in order by clause?

From: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp
Cc: andreas(dot)zeugswetter(at)telecom(dot)at, hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: AW: [HACKERS] using a btree index in order by clause?
Date: 1998-06-17 22:43:25
Message-ID: 199806172243.SAA05955@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

>
> I think these are big win too.
>
> By the way, max(), min() would be optimized in the same way, I guess.
>
> >The biggies also use this access method.
> ~~~~~~~do you mean commercial RDBMSs?

I have modified the TODO list:

* Use indexes in ORDER BY for restrictive data sets, min(), max()(Costin Oproiu)

--
Bruce Momjian | 830 Blythe Avenue
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
+ If your life is a hard drive, | (610) 353-9879(w)
+ Christ can be your backup. | (610) 853-3000(h)

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 1998-06-17 22:54:45 Re: [BUGS] Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump error
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 1998-06-17 19:27:04 lost my e-mail