From: | "Ulrich Voss" <voss(at)vocalweb(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | dg(at)illustra(dot)com (David Gould) |
Cc: | brett(at)work(dot)chicken(dot)org, maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us, pgsql-hackers(at)hub(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] keeping track of connections |
Date: | 1998-06-05 12:31:24 |
Message-ID: | 199806051026.MAA05708@hex.de.uu.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> Ulrich Voss writes:
> > > On Wed, 3 June 1998, at 16:38:43, Ulrich Voss wrote:
> > >
> > > > Massimo had a patch, which added the pid in the first field of the
> > > > debug output (and I guess a timestamp). So you can easily
> > > > sort/grep/trace the debug output.
> > >
> > > I'm looking for a little more than that.
> >
> > OK, but step one is simple, Massimo's patch could possibly be
> > integrated in two or three hours. And it adds valuable debugging
> > info.
> >
> > (Btw., Massimo's patch was the first (and I hope last) very helpful
> > patch, which for obscure reasons never made into the official
> > distribution. And it had this simple pid/time patch (not in current
> > cvs), it had a spinlock patch (not in current cvs), a better deadlock
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> Well, uhmmm, yes there is a spinlock patch in the current CVS. Please look
> again.
Sorry. I meant in the current stable release ...
> Btw, I am about to update the spinlock patch based on some testing I did to
> resolve some of Bruce Momjians performance concerns. I will post the results
> of the testing (which are quite interesting if you are a performance fanatic)
> later today, and the patch this weekend.
>
> -dg
I hope a patch for 6.3.2 will make its way someday ...
Ciao
Ulrich
Ulrich Voss \ \ / /__ / ___|__ _| |
VoCal web publishing \ \ / / _ \| | / _` | |
voss(at)vocalweb(dot)de \ V / (_) | |__| (_| | |
http://www.vocalweb.de \_/ \___/ \____\__,_|_|
Tel: (++49) 203-306-1560 web publishing
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Brook Milligan | 1998-06-05 15:16:27 | Re: [HACKERS] Perl Standard Deviation function is wrong ! |
Previous Message | Andreas Zeugswetter | 1998-06-05 10:05:18 | Perl Standard Deviation function is wrong ! |