| From: | Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | daveh(at)insightdist(dot)com (David Hartwig) |
| Cc: | hannu(at)trust(dot)ee, byronn(at)insightdist(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org, pgsql-interfaces(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Re: [INTERFACES] retrieving varchar size |
| Date: | 1998-04-23 21:09:40 |
| Message-ID: | 199804232109.RAA08650@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-interfaces |
> > The information you want is in pg_attribute.atttypmod. It is normally
> > -1, but is set for char() and varchar() fields, and includes the 4-byte
> > length. See bin/psql/psql.c for a sample of its use.
>
> I see everyone writing in terms of length. You do mean precision, don't
> you? For our purposes, this precision should arrive in the result
> header. (redundancy in each tuple could be over looked) The goal is to be
> able to put realistic bounds on memory allocation before the entire result is
> read in. For this to work, functions must also be able to propagate the
> their precision.
>
> Did I spell doom to this idea?
Hmm. The problem is that many of us use the old 'text' type, which
doesn't have a defined length. Not sure how to handle this in a
portable libpq way?
--
Bruce Momjian | 830 Blythe Avenue
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
+ If your life is a hard drive, | (610) 353-9879(w)
+ Christ can be your backup. | (610) 853-3000(h)
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 1998-04-23 21:16:36 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: [INTERFACES] retrieving varchar size |
| Previous Message | Hannu Krosing | 1998-04-23 20:26:25 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: [INTERFACES] retrieving varchar size |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 1998-04-23 21:16:36 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: [INTERFACES] retrieving varchar size |
| Previous Message | Hannu Krosing | 1998-04-23 20:26:25 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: [INTERFACES] retrieving varchar size |