Re: [HACKERS] Proposal for async support in libpq

From: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us (Tom Lane)
Cc: hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Proposal for async support in libpq
Date: 1998-04-18 05:13:52
Message-ID: 199804180513.BAA06961@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

>
> Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > This all looks good. Another thing we really need it to be able to
> > cancel queries. This would be a big win, and looks like it could fit
> > into the scheme here.
>
> I thought about proposing a PQcancelAsync that would cancel the active
> query-in-progress. But that would require support on the backend side,
> and I am far from competent to make it happen. (libpq is simple enough
> that I'm not afraid to rewrite it, but making major mods to the backend
> is another story. I just got here this week...)

In backend/libpq/pqcomm.c, I see pg_sendoob() which sends out-of-band
data FROM the backend TO the client, but it is not called from anywhere.

This could be a method of signaling that a notification was pending, and
sending out-of-band data FROm the client TO the backend could be used
for cancelling a query.

out-of-band data causes a convenient signal to the process on the other
end, which can easily be used to handle these cases.

--
Bruce Momjian | 830 Blythe Avenue
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
+ If your life is a hard drive, | (610) 353-9879(w)
+ Christ can be your backup. | (610) 853-3000(h)

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Phil Thompson 1998-04-18 09:41:31 Re: [HACKERS] Proposal for async support in libpq
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 1998-04-17 21:01:17 Re: [HACKERS] Proposal for async support in libpq