| From: | Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu (Thomas G(dot) Lockhart) |
| Cc: | scrappy(at)hub(dot)org, hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, ssimkovi(at)rainbow(dot)studorg(dot)tuwien(dot)ac(dot)at |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] HAVING clause and 6.3.2 release |
| Date: | 1998-04-16 14:56:57 |
| Message-ID: | 199804161456.KAA20783@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
>
> > > My question is, "Do we disable the HAVING clause for 6.3.2?" The
> > > bugs are serious and cause crashes.
> > > Do we disable it?
> > Yes...but disabling means that it *will not* be available until
> > v6.4...no v6.3.3 :)
>
> Hmm. What is the downside to leaving it in with caveats or "stay away"
> warnings in the release notes? Since it didn't exist as a feature
> before, the only downside I see is somewhat increased traffic on the
> questions list...
We could do a elog(NOTICE,...) and have a small patch to fix all the
issues once we have a final fix.
--
Bruce Momjian | 830 Blythe Avenue
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
+ If your life is a hard drive, | (610) 353-9879(w)
+ Christ can be your backup. | (610) 853-3000(h)
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Pedro J. Lobo | 1998-04-16 14:58:49 | Status of 6.3.2 snapshot on alpha/Digital Unix |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 1998-04-16 14:54:36 | Re: [HACKERS] HAVING clause and 6.3.2 release |