Re: [HACKERS] Re: [QUESTIONS] UPDATE statement ORACLE 6 compatible

From: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu (Thomas G(dot) Lockhart)
Cc: dschnabel(at)magnet(dot)at, hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [QUESTIONS] UPDATE statement ORACLE 6 compatible
Date: 1998-03-17 03:21:53
Message-ID: 199803170321.WAA01270@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

>
> tgl=> select * from t where cast(i as text) like '40%';
> i
> ----
> 4030
> (1 row)
>
> So, the patch for "function() BETWEEN" helps, but I'm still not sure it
> is safe, since I don't know how these nodes might be handled deeper in
> the backend.
>
> Also, one of my recent testing patches slightly breaks the type
> conversion stuff so the numerology regression test fails on one of the
> inserts and I haven't figured out which piece caused that. Nothing
> should be affected in the CVS tree though.

Ship the patch over here and I will have a look at it.

--
Bruce Momjian | 830 Blythe Avenue
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
+ If your life is a hard drive, | (610) 353-9879(w)
+ Christ can be your backup. | (610) 853-3000(h)

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas G. Lockhart 1998-03-17 03:46:30 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] patches for 6.2.1p6
Previous Message Thomas G. Lockhart 1998-03-17 03:21:04 Re: [QUESTIONS] Re: [HACKERS] text should be a blob field