Re: pl/{perl, pgsql} (was Re: AW: [HACKERS] triggers, views and rules (not instead))

From: Brett McCormick <brett(at)work(dot)chicken(dot)org>
To: jwieck(at)debis(dot)com (Jan Wieck)
Cc: vadim(at)sable(dot)krasnoyarsk(dot)su, Andreas(dot)Zeugswetter(at)telecom(dot)at, mgittens(at)gits(dot)nl, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: pl/{perl, pgsql} (was Re: AW: [HACKERS] triggers, views and rules (not instead))
Date: 1998-02-23 10:41:45
Message-ID: 199802231041.CAA20766@abraxas.scene.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


Please don't CC the root users (or the mailing list twice) on this.
I've removed them from the headers. Sorry, I don't know how the
addresses got in there.

> Brett wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Sun, 22 February 1998, at 18:26:45, Vadim B. Mikheev wrote:
> >
> > Is develemopment being done for PL/pgSQL? What are peoples ideas for
> > this? I've never used a commercial db before, and the free ones don't
> > usualle have a stored PL language. What sort of things are you guys
> > anticipating? In the writing of PL/perl i've been tempted to give
> > lots of access to the backend internals from perl (why not, it should
> > have all the facilities C function programmers have!) What do you think?
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Zeugswetter Andreas SARZ 1998-02-23 11:11:52 Re: pl/{perl,pgsql} (was Re: AW: [HACKERS] triggers, views and ru les (not instead))
Previous Message Mattias Kregert 1998-02-23 10:32:04 Re: [HACKERS] Here it is - view permissions