Re: [HACKERS] Re: Browsing the tables and why pgsql does not perform well

From: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: brett(at)abraxas(dot)scene(dot)com (Brett McCormick)
Cc: hannu(at)trust(dot)ee, scrappy(at)hub(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: Browsing the tables and why pgsql does not perform well
Date: 1998-01-25 00:26:48
Message-ID: 199801250026.TAA23434@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

>
> On Sat, 24 January 1998, at 09:36:41, Hannu Krosing wrote:
>
> > The main problem is that PostgreSQL does not use index for sorting and
> > thus really does a
> > "copy" of the whole table and then sorts it before it can use a few rows
> > from the beginning.
> >
> > Using indexes for sorting as well as selecting is on the TODO list, but
> > seems to be not very high priority.
>
> It doesn't seem like it would be very difficult -- I'd be happy to
> tackle it if given some pointers in the right direction (I am a newbie
> pgsql-hacker and I'm looking for work! give me some!!)
>

It is so complicated, I can not even suggest where to start.

--
Bruce Momjian
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 1998-01-25 00:27:26 Re: [HACKERS] Revoke update on Column
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 1998-01-25 00:24:18 Re: [HACKERS] fork/exec for backend