From: | Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | scrappy(at)hub(dot)org (The Hermit Hacker) |
Cc: | igor(at)nitek(dot)ru, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Re: [QUESTIONS] Business cases |
Date: | 1998-01-21 18:35:38 |
Message-ID: | 199801211835.NAA24002@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
>
>
> Moved to pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, where it should have been moved
> *ages* ago
>
> Connected to:
> Oracle7 Server Release 7.3.3.0.0 - Production Release
> With the distributed, replication and parallel query options
> PL/SQL Release 2.3.3.0.0 - Production
>
> SQL> create table one ( a integer primary key not null );
>
> Table created.
>
> SQL> insert into one values (2);
>
> 1 row created.
>
> SQL> insert into one values (3);
>
> 1 row created.
>
> SQL> insert into one values (1);
>
> 1 row created.
>
> SQL> select * from one;
>
> A
> ----------
> 2
> 3
> 1
>
> SQL> update one set a=a+1;
>
> 3 rows updated.
>
> SQL> select * from one;
>
> A
> ----------
> 3
> 4
> 2
>
Man, how do you implement that behavior? No wonder MySQL fails on it
too.
--
Bruce Momjian
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | The Hermit Hacker | 1998-01-21 18:38:07 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: [QUESTIONS] Business cases |
Previous Message | The Hermit Hacker | 1998-01-21 18:01:10 | Re: [QUESTIONS] Business cases |