Re: [HACKERS] Re: New pg_pwd patch and stuff

From: "Martin J(dot) Laubach" <mjl(at)emsi(dot)priv(dot)at>
To: brandys(at)eng3(dot)hep(dot)uiuc(dot)edu (todd brandys)
Cc: phil(at)river-bank(dot)demon(dot)co(dot)uk, scrappy(at)hub(dot)org, mimo(at)lodz(dot)pdi(dot)net, hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: New pg_pwd patch and stuff
Date: 1998-01-19 03:18:34
Message-ID: 199801190318.EAA00293@rhubarb.emsi.priv.at
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

So, if postmaster can't access the system tables for authentication
purposes, why not have one child forked, connected to the main
postmaster process via some IPC mechanism, whose only purpose
in life it is to answer SQL-queries for postmaster.

mjl

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Vadim B. Mikheev 1998-01-19 04:06:09 Re: [QUESTIONS] Join-crazy newbie may be pushing the limits :-)
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 1998-01-19 02:39:06 Re: varchar() troubles