From: | Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | scrappy(at)hub(dot)org (The Hermit Hacker) |
Cc: | kwitten(at)qdt(dot)com, hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Postgres acl (fwd) |
Date: | 1998-01-06 19:21:32 |
Message-ID: | 199801061921.OAA09822@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
>
> On Tue, 6 Jan 1998, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> > >
> > > On Tue, 6 Jan 1998, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > >
> > > > Can someone who has permission to create databases be trusted not to
> > > > delete others? If we say no, how do we make sure they can change
> > > > pg_database rows on only databases that they own?
> > >
> > > deleting a database is accomplished using 'drop database', no?
> > > Can the code for that not be modified to see whether the person dropping
> > > the database is the person that owns it *or* pgsuperuser?
> >
> > It already does the check, but issues an SQL from the C code to delete
> > from pg_database. I believe any user who can create a database can
> > issue the same SQL command from psql, bypassing the drop database
> > checks, no?
>
> Okay, I understand what you mean here...so I guess the next
> question is should system tables be directly modifyable by non-superuser?
>
> For instance, we have a 'drop database' SQL command...can we
> restrict 'delete from pg_database' to just superuser, while leaving 'drop
> database' open to those with createdb privileges? Same with 'create
> user', and, possible, a 'create group' command instead of 'insert into
> pg_group'?
Yes, we must replace the SQL commands in commands/dbcommands.c with
lower-level C table access routines so we do not have to go to the
executor, where the access permissions are checked.
--
Bruce Momjian
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 1998-01-06 19:57:01 | Re: consttraints.source |
Previous Message | Darren King | 1998-01-06 19:20:15 | Re: [HACKERS] Postgres acl (fwd) |