Re: [HACKERS] subselect

From: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu (Thomas G(dot) Lockhart)
Cc: vadim(at)sable(dot)krasnoyarsk(dot)su, hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] subselect
Date: 1998-01-06 05:06:39
Message-ID: 199801060506.AAA11991@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

>
> > BTW, note that for _expression_ subqueries (which are introduced without
> > IN, EXISTS, ALL, ANY - this follows Sybase' naming) - as in your examples -
> > we have to check that subquery returns single tuple...
>
> It might be nice to have a tuple-counting operation or query node (is this the right
> terminology?) which could be used to help implement EXISTS. It might help to
> re-implement the count(*) function also.

In the new code, count(*) picks a column from one of the tables to count
on.

--
Bruce Momjian
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 1998-01-06 05:19:32 Re: [HACKERS] Postgres acl
Previous Message Thomas G. Lockhart 1998-01-06 04:50:12 Re: [HACKERS] subselect